Let’s not talk about 2011. Not much, at least, maybe just enough to justify why we might want to forget it. It was a year of deaths and diseases, of trying to move forward in life and—largely—failing. This wasn’t universally true, since there were high points: weddings, new friends, realizations about others and self… even in the bad years, life marches on and wisdom accumulates, even if neither moves at a regular or predictable pace. But on the whole, this was a year best left behind.
So what, then, for 2012? Resolutions? Let’s see: my one resolution for 2012 is to not rely on resolution.
Since I’ve started therapy, I’ve discovered enough flaws (and I’ll get to my usage of that word soon enough) in my character that I should probably work on. The problem is that one of them is shying away from commitment. Well, okay, no; it isn’t so much shying away from commitment as being too married to commitment, while simultaneously being terrified of it. When I make a resolution or commitment I tend to switch into all-or-nothing mode. I can’t accept anything less than optimized perfection, and if anything less seems likely, I prefer not trying at all. That’s the reason why one missed gym session leads to months (sometimes years) of dormancy, or why a late start in a morning turns into a wasted day, which turns into an empty week, or why one mistake on a project makes me want to burn it all to the ground.
It’s all well and good to try and tell myself that it’s okay to make mistakes, but I do already know that. Obviously it’s okay to make mistakes, since I’ve made plenty and am still alive. The issue, instead of any potential grotesque consequences of mistakes, is the value judgment that my inner critic assigns to them. A mistake is never simply an error, it’s an inadequacy, a flaw.
Which reminds me: I used the word “flaw” earlier because it is flaws that I’ve found in myself. There’s no real way to accurately sugarcoat it. But what I (and I’m sure many others) do is to take that word and all of its connoted value judgments and internalize them automatically.
I was scanning through a book at the Aikido dojo one night: Zen Driving. There was a phrase used in it, something to the effect of “observe without judgment”. This phrase stuck with me over the next few months. I’m pretty far from a defensive driver, and it works for me in terms of results. I cut through traffic pretty well without getting into or causing any accidents. Along the way, however, I get really irritated with other people. Passengers in my car are often treated to “conversations” between me and the other drivers on the road, ranging from brief mutters to (on occasion) one-sided yelling matches. It’s probably no surprise that this does not make Alice happy to be my passenger.
When she’d talk to me about it, though, I’d get defensive: yeah, I didn’t need to get so mad at other anonymous drivers, but come on! Look at the stupid things they were doing! Look how they were getting in my way! I thought I couldn’t let go of my righteous anger without also ceding my correctness.
One of the tenets of Zen, especially as it’s understood by laymen (including myself), is to let go of things; in effect, to avoid value judgments and just be. However, the misunderstanding is that “right” and “wrong” are value judgments—and thus to be avoided—when in reality they’re states of being. Zen Driving was telling me what my ego needed to hear, that letting go of the value judgment and the attached emotions didn’t necessitate letting go of the truth of the situation and the attached actions. If somebody cuts me off to go half the speed limit in front of me, I can change lanes and floor my way past without getting angry about it. The “good” and “bad” of the situation are not for me to judge, and really the “right” or “wrong”—while entirely in the realm of logic—are moot. All that matters is that the situation is as it is, and I should change (or not change) my actions accordingly and continue on my way.
So these characteristics I’ve discovered in myself—the avoidance behavior, the distractability, the catastrophizing, and many others—are flaws, because “flaw” is just a state of being. A characteristic can be a “flaw” without being “good” or “bad” in reflection on me; contrary to what my inner critic thinks, I and others can have flaws without reducing our value as people. The flaw is, however, part of the reality of the situation, and I should try to change my actions to compensate. A missed gym session doesn’t make me a failure as a human being, it just means I should try harder to get myself to the gym next time. Making a wrong play in a game doesn’t mean that I should scrap it all and start over, it just means I should learn from what happened and continue trying to make the best of the changed situation. A mistake isn’t a showstopper, isn’t a reason to give up, it’s just a new facet of reality to adjust to.
This is easier said than done, of course, and resolutions and lofty goals don’t exactly help in promoting the malleable nature of fallacy. Resolutions are made to be all-or-nothing. Lose fifty pounds or bust! Read ninety books this year! Make seven million dollars! The focus is constantly on the endpoint, not the progress made leading towards it.
So my resolution this year is to, while I’m trying new things and starting new projects and learning new skills and trying to make myself better in a variety of ways, not focus on the endpoints. It’s to let myself make mistakes, and to not treat those mistakes as fatal, as reasons to quit and see what happens next week, or next year, but to try my best to adapt to their effects right then, and continue onward. It’s to let go of the value judgments I apply to myself, and to instead concentrate on my state of being. So no, no resolutions… just Zen.
Posted by Eug